Monday, December 31, 2007

"What's a conservative to do?"

A sentiment voiced by many conservatives this election cycle, I'm certain. And one voiced by Playwriter Girl in a comment to my Huckabee post below. For, despite what the drive-bys would have us believe, there is no real conservative in this year's presidential race. Here are the Republican candidates as I see them.

HuckabeeA Liberal's Republican. Vote for Mike if you want your taxes raised.
HunterSolid conservative, but where is he? Where's his passion?
McCainNope. Already rejected by Republicans. Besides, Star Wars is passe—we don't need another Luke Skywalker.
PaulKook, kook, kook.
RomneyAccomplished businessman and Governor. But waffles too much for my taste.
ThompsonPossibly the most conservative of the bunch. Seems to have little energy. Great statesman, unproven leader.

And that leaves my choice, Rudy Giuliani.

Here is my criteria for selecting Rudy. Line up all the candidates side by side and ask yourself this question: which one of these candidates will the terrorists be most afraid of? For me, it's Rudy. Yes, he's not the most conservative of the bunch, there's no question about that. However, he has stated that he will appoint constructionists to the Supreme Court. While he is personally pro-abortion, he recognizes that it is the people's decision through the governments of their respective states. He is an accomplished administrator, having cleaned up New York City of crime before September 11 and of tragedy afterward. He is an accomplish prosecutor. He led the charge to rid New York of organized crime with tremendous success.

For what it's worth, Mr. Light Bulb recommends voting for Rudy Giuliani as the Republican candidate for President of the United States.

2 comments:

Michael Tams said...

Mr. LB,

Help me out here. How's voting for a pro-abortion non-conservative good for either the GOP or America? Using your criteria (strictly national security), people should have voted for John McCain instead of GWB in 2000. I think as much as I have issues with GWB (who Huck is a lot like), a McCain presidency would have been a lot worse - think immigration, free speech, judges, etc.

Happy New Year.

-MT

Mr. Light Bulb said...

Hey Mr. Tams,

Unfortunately, it's the situation we find ourselves in. You're absolutely right, Rudy is not a conservative, and he's pro-abortion. In fact, no one left in the race (except Hunter, and he won't win) is a conservative. That's just the way it is.

As for the abortion issue, he'll appoint constructionist judges. Again, not the best situation, but one I'm willing to accept for a winner.

No, I would have never voted for McCain, even in 2000, and even if national security was the sole issue. McCain is just . . . unstable. He loved pandering to the media as the anti-Bush in 2000. For McCain back then, it was "anything for a vote and a good headline." He's sobered some in the past eight years, but still too unstable for me.