Friday, April 06, 2007

"Bug Eyes" does Damascus

In a move perfectly fitting a formerly power-starved and newly minted liberal leader, Bug Eyes Pelosi decided to personally deliver a message of peace to the Middle East. Unfortunately for her, not all journalists fit the press-release-regurgitating, mind-numbed-robot mold to which US journalists aspire. (And I use the term "US journalists" in the lightest of senses.)

Here's what one observer wrote about Speaker Pelosi's "declaration of peace" faux pas:

Although Pelosi proudly marched into her meeting with Syrian President Assad and boldly announced a new peace message from Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, the Speaker's diplomatic triumph was lacking in one vital detail:

It was simply not true!

Indeed, Olmert's office issued a rare "clarification" Wednesday that contradicted Speaker Pelosi's claim.

In other words, America's most powerful woman is incapable of grasping and accurately communicating a simple message.

Bottom line: Absolutely nothing has changed in Israel and nothing will change in Syria just because a meddling old woman with dementia and botox poisoning has decided to save the world with "granny diplomacy."
Rock on Bug Eyes. Keep making a fool of yourself. As it turns out, the trip hasn't been a total flop. There's one group that's fallen head over heels for Bug Eyes: the Terrorists.
One terror leader, Khaled Al-Batch, a militant and spokesman for Islamic Jihad, expressed hope Pelosi would continue winning elections, explaining the House speaker's Damascus visit demonstrated she understands the Middle East.

Pelosi's visit was opposed by President Bush, who called Syria a "state sponsor of terror."

"Nancy Pelosi understands the area (Middle East) well, more than Bush and Dr. (Condoleeza) Rice," said Al-Batch, speaking to WND from Gaza. "If the Democrats want to make negotiations with Syria, Hamas, and Hezbollah, this means the Democratic Party understands well what happens in this area and I think Pelosi will succeed. ... I hope she wins the next elections."
Sounds like she should hit up Al-Batch for campaign contributions . . . or legal defense fund contributions. You see, it's very likely that Bug Eyes has violated the Logan Act.

UPDATE - Here's a more detailed Logan Act violation explanation from Opinion Journal.

No comments: